Re: OSD read latency grows over time

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> Just curious, can decreasing rocksdb_cf_compact_on_deletion_trigger 16384 >
> 4096 hurt performance of HDD OSDs in any way? I have no growing latency on
> HDD OSD, where data is stored, but it would be easier to set it to [osd]
> section without cherry picking only SSD/NVME OSDs, but for all at once.

I think that depends on your workload, but I'm not certain.

If you don't override the OSD classes, you should be able to do
something like "ceph config set osd/class:ssd
rocksdb_cf_compact_on_deletion_trigger 4096".

Josh

On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 10:27 AM Roman Pashin <romanpashin28@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately they cannot. You'll want to set them in centralized conf
> > and then restart OSDs for them to take effect.
> >
>
> Got it. Thank you Josh! WIll put it to config of affected OSDs and restart
> them.
>
> Just curious, can decreasing rocksdb_cf_compact_on_deletion_trigger 16384 >
> 4096 hurt performance of HDD OSDs in any way? I have no growing latency on
> HDD OSD, where data is stored, but it would be easier to set it to [osd]
> section without cherry picking only SSD/NVME OSDs, but for all at once.
>
> --
> Thank you,
> Roman
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux