Re: recommendation for barebones server with 8-12 direct attach NVMe?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jan 12, 2024 at 02:32:12PM +0000, Drew Weaver wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> So we were going to replace a Ceph cluster with some hardware we had
> laying around using SATA HBAs but I was told that the only right way
> to build Ceph in 2023 is with direct attach NVMe.
> 
> Does anyone have any recommendation for a 1U barebones server (we just
> drop in ram disks and cpus) with 8-10 2.5" NVMe bays that are direct
> attached to the motherboard without a bridge or HBA for Ceph
> specifically?
If you're buying new, Supermicro would be my first choice for vendor
based on experience.
https://www.supermicro.com/en/products/nvme

You said 2.5" bays, which makes me think you have existing drives.
There are models to fit that, but if you're also considering new drives,
you can get further density in E1/E3

The only caveat is that you will absolutely want to put a better NIC in
these systems, because 2x10G is easy to saturate with a pile of NVME.

-- 
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation President & Treasurer
E-Mail   : robbat2@xxxxxxxxxx
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux