Hi Wes, thanks the `ceph tell mon.* sessions` got me the answer very quickly :-) Cheers /Simon On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 at 18:27, Wesley Dillingham <wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > You can ask the monitor to dump its sessions (which should expose the IPs > and the release / features) you can then track down by IP those with the > undesirable features/release > > ceph daemon mon.`hostname -s` sessions > > Assuming your mon is named after the short hostname, you may need to do > this for every mon. Alternatively using the `ceph tell mon.* sessions` to > hit every mon at once. > > Respectfully, > > *Wes Dillingham* > wes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/wesleydillingham> > > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2023 at 10:46 AM Anthony D'Atri <anthony.datri@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> [rook@rook-ceph-tools-5ff8d58445-gkl5w .aws]$ ceph features >> { >> "mon": [ >> { >> "features": "0x3f01cfbf7ffdffff", >> "release": "luminous", >> "num": 3 >> } >> ], >> "osd": [ >> { >> "features": "0x3f01cfbf7ffdffff", >> "release": "luminous", >> "num": 600 >> } >> ], >> "client": [ >> { >> "features": "0x2f018fb87aa4aafe", >> "release": "luminous", >> "num": 41 >> }, >> { >> "features": "0x3f01cfbf7ffdffff", >> "release": "luminous", >> "num": 147 >> } >> ], >> "mgr": [ >> { >> "features": "0x3f01cfbf7ffdffff", >> "release": "luminous", >> "num": 2 >> } >> ] >> } >> [rook@rook-ceph-tools-5ff8d58445-gkl5w .aws]$ >> >> IIRC there are nuances, there are case where a client can *look* like >> Jewel but actually be okay. >> >> >> > On Dec 21, 2023, at 10:41, Simon Oosthoek <simon.oosthoek@xxxxxxxxx> >> wrote: >> > >> > Hi, >> > >> > Our cluster is currently running quincy, and I want to set the minimal >> > client version to luminous, to enable upmap balancer, but when I tried >> to, >> > I got this: >> > >> > # ceph osd set-require-min-compat-client luminous Error EPERM: cannot >> set >> > require_min_compat_client to luminous: 2 connected client(s) look like >> > jewel (missing 0x800000000000000); add --yes-i-really-mean-it to do it >> > anyway >> > >> > I think I know the most likely candidate (and I've asked them), but is >> > there a way to find out, the way ceph seems to know? >> > >> > tnx >> > >> > /Simon >> > -- >> > I'm using my gmail.com address, because the gmail.com dmarc policy is >> > "none", some mail servers will reject this (microsoft?) others will >> instead >> > allow this when I send mail to a mailling list which has not yet been >> > configured to send mail "on behalf of" the sender, but rather do a kind >> of >> > "forward". The latter situation causes dkim/dmarc failures and the dmarc >> > policy will be applied. see https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC for more >> details >> > _______________________________________________ >> > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx >> > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx >> _______________________________________________ >> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx >> > -- I'm using my gmail.com address, because the gmail.com dmarc policy is "none", some mail servers will reject this (microsoft?) others will instead allow this when I send mail to a mailling list which has not yet been configured to send mail "on behalf of" the sender, but rather do a kind of "forward". The latter situation causes dkim/dmarc failures and the dmarc policy will be applied. see https://wiki.list.org/DEV/DMARC for more details _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |