Re: EC Profiles & DR

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ok, so I've misunderstood the meaning of failure domain. If there is no way to request using 2 osd/node and node as failure domain, with 5 nodes k=3+m=1 is not secure enough and I will have to use k=2+m=2, so like a raid1  setup. A little bit better than replication in the point of view of global storage capacity.

Patrick

Le 05/12/2023 à 12:19, David C. a écrit :
Hi,

To return to my comparison with SANs, on a SAN you have spare disks to repair a failed disk.

On Ceph, you therefore need at least one more host (k+m+1).

If we take into consideration the formalities/delivery times of a new server, k+m+2 is not luxury (Depending on the growth of your volume).

________________________________________________________

Cordialement,

*David CASIER*

________________________________________________________



Le mar. 5 déc. 2023 à 11:17, Patrick Begou <Patrick.Begou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

    Hi Robert,

    Le 05/12/2023 à 10:05, Robert Sander a écrit :
    > On 12/5/23 10:01, duluxoz wrote:
    >> Thanks David, I knew I had something wrong  :-)
    >>
    >> Just for my own edification: Why is k=2, m=1 not recommended for
    >> production? Considered to "fragile", or something else?
    >
    > It is the same as a replicated pool with size=2. Only one host
    can go
    > down. After that you risk to lose data.
    >
    > Erasure coding is possible with a cluster size of 10 nodes or more.
    > With smaller clusters you have to go with replicated pools.
    >
    Could you explain why 10 nodes are required for EC ?

    On my side, I'm working on building my first (small) Ceph cluster
    using
    E.C. and I was thinking about 5 nodes and k=4 m=2. With a failure
    domain
    on host and several osd by nodes, in my mind this setup may run
    degraded
    with 3 nodes using 2 distincts osd by node and the ultimate
    possibility
    to loose an additional node without loosing data.  Of course with
    sufficient free storage available.

    Am I totally wrong in my first ceph approach ?

    Patrick
    _______________________________________________
    ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
    To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux