Re: Slow recovery and inaccurate recovery figures since Quincy upgrade

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Iain,


Does anyone have any ideas of what could be the issue here or anywhere we
> can check what is going on??
>
>
You could be hitting the slow backfill/recovery issue with
mclock_scheduler.
Could you please provide the output of the following commands?

1. ceph versions
2. ceph config get osd.<id> osd_op_queue
3. ceph config show osd.<id> | grep osd_max_backfills
4. ceph config show osd.<id> | grep osd_recovery_max_active
5. ceph config show-with-defaults osd.<id> | grep osd_mclock where 'id' can
be any valid osd id

With the mclock_scheduler enabled and with 17.2.5, it is not possible to
override
recovery settings like 'osd_max_backfills' and other recovery related
config options.

To improve the recovery rate, you can temporarily switch the mClock profile
to 'high_recovery_ops'
on all the OSDs by issuing:

ceph config set osd osd_mclock_profile high_recovery_ops

During recovery with this profile, you may notice a dip in the client ops
performance which is expected.
Once the recovery is done, you can switch the mClock profile back to the
default 'high_client_ops' profile.

Please note that the upcoming Quincy release will address the slow backfill
issues along with other
usability improvements.

-Sridhar
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux