But Rocky Linux 9 is the continuation of what CentOS would have been on el9. Afaik is ceph being developed on elX distributions and not the 'trial' stream versions, not? > > In most cases the 'Alternative' distro like Alma or Rocky have outdated > versions of packages, if we compared it with CentOS Stream 8 or CentOS > Stream 9. For example is a golang package, on c8s is a 1.20 version on > Alma still 1.19 > > You can try to use c8s/c9s or try to contribute to your distro to > resolve dependency issues > > > > > > I've been digging and I can't see that this has come up anywhere. > > > > I'm trying to update a client from Pacific 17.2.3-2 to 17.2.6-4 and > I'm getting the error > > > > Error: > > Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package ceph- > base-2:17.2.3-2.el9s.x86_64 > > - nothing provides liburing.so.2()(64bit) needed by ceph-base- > 2:17.2.6-4.el9s.x86_64 > > - nothing provides liburing.so.2(LIBURING_2.0)(64bit) needed by ceph- > base-2:17.2.6-4.el9s.x86_64 > > (try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '-- > nobest' to use not only best candidate packages) > > > > Did Ceph Pacific switch to requiring liburing 2? Rocky 9 only provides > 0.7-7. CentOS stream seems to have 1.0.7-3 (at least back to when I set > up that repo on Foreman; I don't remember if I'm keeping it up-to-date). > > > > Can I/should I just do --nobest when updating? I could probably build > it from a source RPM from another RH-based distro, but I'd rather keep > it clean with the same distro. > > _______________________________________________ _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |