Re: RGW versioned bucket index issues

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Cory,

2023年6月16日(金) 0:54 Cory Snyder <csnyder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Hi Satoru,
>
> Unfortunately suspending versioning on a bucket prior to resharding does
> not work around this issue.
>

Sure. Thank you for your quick response.


> Is it possible to stop client requests to the relevant bucket during
> resharding?
>

I'm an admin and the user of this versioned bucket is not me. So I'll ask
them whether stopping request is acceptable.

Best,
Satoru



> Cory
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@xxxxxxxxx>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, June 14, 2023 11:42 PM
> *To:* Cory Snyder <csnyder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> *Cc:* ceph-users@xxxxxxx <ceph-users@xxxxxxx>; Ceph Dev List <dev@xxxxxxx>
> *Subject:* Re:  RGW versioned bucket index issues
>
> Hi Cory, > 1. PUT requests during reshard of versioned bucket fail with
> 404 and leave > behind dark data > > Tracker: https: //urldefense.
> com/v3/__https: //tracker. ceph.
> com/issues/61359__;!!J0dtj8f0ZRU!iYeliiauhqQFoQtyS_k_xXA3Bj6qrYRNunU-wxUE7QGYlRqXnxtPQ5WI4pf-HmrHUjI3vzDYBx2VvbO4FbYLABID-wMfIRo$
>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerStart
> This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
> You have not previously corresponded with this sender.
> Report Suspicious
>
> <https://us-phishalarm-ewt.proofpoint.com/EWT/v1/J0dtj8f0ZRU!gpOLoAmYo0w0NJ4yBJNe9Nv9-reakE7CSeulmGLok4g5wFW9L46Hw8_VUJqmXRt5XY-87NlMHullk5Pll6kNakV4Z2-Y0wAdQbNQUmOWK6gfHkzYHZjslAQF9plK6e_A$>
>
> ZjQcmQRYFpfptBannerEnd
>
> Hi Cory,
>
> > 1. PUT requests during reshard of versioned bucket fail with 404 and leave
> >    behind dark data
> >
> >    Tracker: https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/61359__;!!J0dtj8f0ZRU!iYeliiauhqQFoQtyS_k_xXA3Bj6qrYRNunU-wxUE7QGYlRqXnxtPQ5WI4pf-HmrHUjI3vzDYBx2VvbO4FbYLABID-wMfIRo$
>
> Could you tell me whether this problem is bypassed by
> suspending(disabling) versioned buckets?
>
> I have some versioning buckets in my Ceph v17.2.6 clusters. These
> buckets need to be resharded
> to resolve large omap warnings caused by large index shard objects.
> This warning has existed for some
> months and the number of objects has been bigger and bigger. So I'd
> like to resolve this as soon as possible.
>
> In addition, if you have any other workaround, please let me know.
>
> Best,
> Satoru
>
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux