Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
From: "Louis Koo" <zhucan.k8s@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2023 02:23:30 -0000
In-reply-to: <35F65829-23A4-44E3-B8F1-ABBAC5963036@k0ste.ru>
References: <35F65829-23A4-44E3-B8F1-ABBAC5963036@k0ste.ru>
User-agent: HyperKitty on http://lists.ceph.io/

the pgp_num reduce quickly but pg_num is still slowly.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

References:
- Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
  - From: Konstantin Shalygin

Prev by Date: Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
Next by Date: Re: S3 and Omap
Previous by thread: Re: The pg_num from 1024 reduce to 32 spend much time, is there way to shorten the time？
Next by thread: PGs stuck undersized and not scrubbed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Information on CEPH] [Linux Filesystem Development] [Ceph Development] [Ceph Large] [Ceph Dev] [Linux USB Development] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite News] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [xfs]

Powered by Linux