Re: Dedicated radosgw gateways

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,


thank you for the response. That sounds like a reasonable solution.

Michal

On 5/15/23 14:15, Konstantin Shalygin wrote:
Hi,

On 15 May 2023, at 14:58, Michal Strnad <michal.strnad@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

at Cephalocon 2023, it was mentioned several times that for service tasks such as data deletion via garbage collection or data replication in S3 via zoning, it is good to do them on dedicated radosgw gateways and not mix them with gateways used by users. How can this be achieved? How can we isolate these tasks? Will using dedicated keyrings instead of admin keys be sufficient? How do you operate this in your environment?

Just:

# don't put client traffic to "dedicated radosgw gateways"
# disable lc/gc on "gateways used by users" via `rgw_enable_lc_threads = false` & `rgw_enable_gc_threads = false`


k

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux