Re: 17.2.6 Dashboard/RGW Signature Mismatch

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

For what is worth, we have a similar problem in 16..2.10 that I had no time to troubleshoot yet. It happened after adding a haproxy in front of rgw to manage https and switch rgw to http (to overcome the other pb mentioned when using https in rgw). The access/secret key is refused despite it matches the dashboard user.

Best regards,

Michel
Sent from my mobile
Le 13 avril 2023 19:26:00 Chris Palmer <chris.palmer@xxxxxxxxx> a écrit :

On 13/04/2023 18:15, Gilles Mocellin wrote:

I suspect the same origin of our problem in 16.2.11, see Tuesday's thread
" Pacific dashboard: unable to get RGW information".
https://www.mail-archive.com/ceph-users%40ceph.io/msg19566.html

Unfortunately I don't think it is the same problem. We are not using TLS
into the RGW instances. They are fronted by an HAProxy instance that
provides the TLS termination and load-balancing. Tcpdump shows the
connections are fine, and the error is a 403 (denied) along with the
text indicating the signature problem. And we have the same setup on
both clusters (1) and (2) yet only (2) is failing...

Thanks for the reference though.

Chris



_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux