Why was it done that way? I do not understand the reason why distributing > the IOPS accross different disks, when the measurement we have is for one > disk alone. This means with default parameters we will always be far from > reaching OSD limit right? > > It's not on different disks. We distribute the IOPS across shards on a given OSD/disk. This is an internal implementation detail. This means in your case, 450 IOPS is distributed across 5 shards on the same OSD/disk. You can think of it as 5 threads being allocated a share of the total IOPS on a given OSD. -Sridhar _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |