Re: cephadm and the future

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> Question:
> What does the future hold with regard to cephadm vs rpm/deb packages? If it is
> now suggested to use cephadm and thus containers to deploy new clusters, what
> does the future hold? Is there an intent, at sometime in the future, to no
> longer support rpm/deb packages for Linux systems, and only support the
> cephadm container method?
> I am not asking to argue containers vs traditional bare metal installs. I am
> just trying to plan for the future. Thanks

I am also interested in this question. For now you can argue that you are save with the os packages, because the current containers are nothing else than a (different) os on a os. 
This of course changes when you get containers that just having binaries (or something small like alpine linux).

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux