Its very strange. The keyring of the ceph monitor is the same as on one
of the working monitor hosts. The failed mon and the working mons also
have the same selinux policies and firewalld settings. The connection is
also present since, all osd deamons are up on the failed ceph monitor node.
Am 13.12.2022 um 11:43 schrieb Eugen Block:
So you get "Permission denied" errors, I'm guessing either the mon
keyring is not present (or wrong) or the mon directory doesn't belong
to the ceph user. Can you check
ls -l /var/lib/ceph/FSID/mon.sparci-store1/
Compare the keyring file with the ones on the working mon nodes.
Zitat von Mevludin Blazevic <mblazevic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi Eugen,
I assume the mon db is stored on the "OS disk". I could not find any
error related lines in cephadm.log, here is what journalctl -xe tells
me:
Dec 13 11:24:21 sparci-store1
ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f-mon-sparci-store1[786211]:
debug 2022-12-13T10:24:21.392+0000 7f318e1fa700 1
mon.sparci-store1@-1(???).paxosservice(auth 251..491) refresh
upgraded, format 0 -> 3
Dec 13 11:24:21 sparci-store1
ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f-mon-sparci-store1[786211]:
debug 2022-12-13T10:24:21.397+0000 7f3179248700 1 heartbeat_map
reset_timeout 'Monitor::cpu_tp thread 0x7f3179248700' had timed out
after 0.000000000s
Dec 13 11:24:21 sparci-store1
ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f-mon-sparci-store1[786211]:
debug 2022-12-13T10:24:21.397+0000 7f318e1fa700 0
mon.sparci-store1@-1(probing) e5 my rank is now 1 (was -1)
Dec 13 11:24:21 sparci-store1
ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f-mon-sparci-store1[786211]:
debug 2022-12-13T10:24:21.398+0000 7f317ba4d700 -1
mon.sparci-store1@1(probing) e5 handle_auth_bad_method hmm, they
didn't like 2 result (13) Permission denied
Dec 13 11:24:21 sparci-store1 systemd[1]: Started Ceph
mon.sparci-store1 for 8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f.
-- Subject: Unit
ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f@mon.sparci-store1.service
has finished start-up
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: https://access.redhat.com/support
--
-- Unit
ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f@mon.sparci-store1.service
has finished starting up.
--
-- The start-up result is done.
Dec 13 11:24:21 sparci-store1
ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f-mon-sparci-store1[786211]:
debug 2022-12-13T10:24:21.599+0000 7f317ba4d700 -1
mon.sparci-store1@1(probing) e5 handle_auth_bad_method hmm, they
didn't like 2 result (13) Permission denied
Dec 13 11:24:21 sparci-store1
ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f-mon-sparci-store1[786211]:
debug 2022-12-13T10:24:21.600+0000 7f3177a45700 0
mon.sparci-store1@1(probing) e18 removed from monmap, suicide.
Dec 13 11:24:21 sparci-store1 systemd[1]:
var-lib-containers-storage-overlay-2e67bce8ea3795683c4326479c7169a713e9a7630b31f25d60cd45bbd9fa56bd-merged.mount:
Succeeded.
-- Subject: Unit succeeded
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: https://access.redhat.com/support
--
-- The unit
var-lib-containers-storage-overlay-2e67bce8ea3795683c4326479c7169a713e9a7630b31f25d60cd45bbd9fa56bd-merged.mount
has successfully entered the 'dead' state.
Dec 13 11:24:21 sparci-store1 bash[786318]: Error: no container with
name or ID
"ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f-mon.sparci-store1" found:
no such container
Dec 13 11:24:21 sparci-store1 bash[786346]: Error: no container with
name or ID
"ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f-mon-sparci-store1" found:
no such container
Dec 13 11:24:21 sparci-store1 bash[786375]: Error: no container with
name or ID
"ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f-mon.sparci-store1" found:
no such container
Dec 13 11:24:21 sparci-store1 systemd[1]:
ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f@mon.sparci-store1.service:
Succeeded.
-- Subject: Unit succeeded
-- Defined-By: systemd
-- Support: https://access.redhat.com/support
--
-- The unit
ceph-8c774934-1535-11ec-973e-525400130e4f@mon.sparci-store1.service
has successfully entered the 'dead' state.
Regards,
Mevludin
Am 08.12.2022 um 09:30 schrieb Eugen Block:
Hi,
do the MONs use the same SAS interface? They store the mon db on
local disk, so it might be related. But without any logs or more
details it's just guessing.
Regards,
Eugen
Zitat von Mevludin Blazevic <mblazevic@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi all,
I'm running Pacific with cephadm.
After installation, ceph automatically provisoned 5 ceph monitor
nodes across the cluster. After a few OSDs crashed due to a
hardware related issue with the SAS interface, 3 monitor services
are stopped and won't restart again. Is it related to the OSD crash
problem?
Thanks,
Mevludin
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
--
Mevludin Blazevic, M.Sc.
University of Koblenz-Landau
Computing Centre (GHRKO)
Universitaetsstrasse 1
D-56070 Koblenz, Germany
Room A023
Tel: +49 261/287-1326
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
--
Mevludin Blazevic, M.Sc.
University of Koblenz-Landau
Computing Centre (GHRKO)
Universitaetsstrasse 1
D-56070 Koblenz, Germany
Room A023
Tel: +49 261/287-1326
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
