Hello all, setting "*ceph config set mgr mgr/prometheus/server_addr 0.0.0.0*" as described in the manual config documentation and restarting all manager daemons solved the problem so far. :-) Thanks and best regards, Christoph Ackermann Am Mo., 10. Okt. 2022 um 16:25 Uhr schrieb Ackermann, Christoph < c.ackermann@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > Oh, see this... > > mgr advanced mgr/prometheus/server_addr localhost > > BANG! > > > > Am Mo., 10. Okt. 2022 um 16:24 Uhr schrieb Ackermann, Christoph < > c.ackermann@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > >> Well, we have a well running ceph base system i've pimped this morning >> by using cephadm method for monitoring addon: >> >> https://docs.ceph.com/en/quincy/cephadm/services/monitoring/#deploying-monitoring-with-cephadm >> >> All three manager can be accessed via IPv4 address from other hosts. The >> configuration is completely "out of the box" >> >> mgr advanced mgr/prometheus/server_port 9283 >> >> Best regards, >> Christoph >> >> >> >> >> >> Am Mo., 10. Okt. 2022 um 16:08 Uhr schrieb Matt Vandermeulen < >> storage@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> >>> That output suggests that the mgr is configured to only listen on the >>> loopback address. >>> >>> I don't think that's a default... does a `ceph config dump | grep mgr` >>> suggest it's been configured that way? >>> >>> >>> On 2022-10-10 10:56, Ackermann, Christoph wrote: >>> > Hello list member >>> > >>> > after subsequent installation of Ceph (17.2.4) monitoring stuff we got >>> > this >>> > error: The mgr/prometheus module at ceph1n020.int.infoserve.de:9283 is >>> > unreachable ..... (and also for second prometheus module). Prometheus >>> > module is activated indeed... >>> > >>> > [root@ceph1n020 ~]# ss -ant |egrep "9095|9283" >>> > *LISTEN 0 5 [::1]:9283 >>> > [::]:** >>> > LISTEN 0 1024 *:9095 >>> >>> > *:* >>> > >>> > ESTAB 0 0 [::ffff:10.100.1.120]:9095 >>> > [::ffff:10.100.1.121]:41990 >>> > ESTAB 0 0 [::1]:44428 >>> > [::1]:9283 >>> > ESTAB 0 0 [::ffff:10.100.1.120]:9095 >>> > [::ffff:10.100.1.121]:41992 >>> > ESTAB 0 0 [::ffff:10.100.1.120]:9095 >>> > [::ffff:10.100.1.121]:42024 >>> > ESTAB 0 0 [::ffff:10.100.1.120]:9095 >>> > [::ffff:10.192.2.10]:58638 >>> > ESTAB 0 0 [::ffff:10.100.1.120]:9095 >>> > [::ffff:10.100.1.121]:42010 >>> > ESTAB 0 0 [::1]:9283 >>> > [::1]:44428 >>> > >>> > The whole cluster runs in an IPv4 setup, wondering that port 9283 only >>> > binds on localhost/IPv6 >>> > >>> > [root@ceph1n020 ~]# telnet localhost 9283 >>> > Trying ::1... >>> > Connected to localhost. >>> > Escape character is '^]'. >>> > ^C >>> > Connection closed by foreign host. >>> > [root@ceph1n020 ~]# telnet 10.100.1.120 9283 >>> > Trying 10.100.1.120... >>> > telnet: connect to address 10.100.1.120: Connection refused >>> > >>> > All other services listen carefully on both addresses. >>> > >>> > Does somebody have a hint for us? >>> > >>> > Best regards, >>> > Christoph Ackermann >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx >>> > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx >>> >> _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |