Re: Unbalanced Cluster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Richard,

Thanks for that.  It never occurred to me that we'd need at least 10 
servers for that shape of EC.  We will certainly push to get that new 
server in now.

-Dave

On 2022-05-04 5:07 p.m., Richard Bade wrote:
> [△EXTERNAL]
>
>
>
> Hi David,
> I think that part of the problem with unbalanced osds is that your EC
> rule k=7,m=2 gives 9 total chunks and you have 9 total servers. This
> is essentially tying cephs hands as it has no choice where to put the
> pg's. Assuming a failure domain of host then each EC shard needs to be
> on a different host.
> Therefore adding another host would help, but you're still going to be
> limited. For balance a rule of k=4,m=2 would work better on 9 servers.
> I had a similar experience with 6 hosts and 4,2 EC rule.
> This may also cause you other problems if you have a host failure as
> you wouldn't be able to balance out the host due to 8 hosts being less
> than 9 shards. You would stay degraded. At least that is my
> understanding. I'm happy to be corrected if I've put you wrong.
>
> Rich
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux