Re: Need feedback on cache tiering

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

we've noticed the warnings for quite some time now, but we're big fans of the cache tier. :-) IIRC we set it up some time around 2015 or 2016 for our production openstack environment and it works nicely for us. We tried it without the cache some time after we switched to Nautilus but the performance was really bad, so we enabled it again. Of course, one could argue that we could just use SSD OSDs for the cached pool, too. But since the cache works fine we don't find it necessary to rebuild the entire pool with larger SSDs. We're currently sill on Nautilus, we want to upgrade to Octopus soon. But I think we would vote for keeping the cache tier. :-)

Regards,
Eugen


Zitat von Neha Ojha <nojha@xxxxxxxxxx>:

Hi everyone,

We'd like to understand how many users are using cache tiering and in
which release.
The cache tiering code is not actively maintained, and there are known
performance issues with using it (documented in
https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/operations/cache-tiering/#a-word-of-caution).
We are wondering if we can deprecate cache tiering sometime soon.

Thanks,
Neha

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux