Re: Local NTP servers on monitor node's.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



It's nice to hear I'm on the right track.

Thanks for the answers.

Anthony D'Atri <anthony.datri@xxxxxxxxx>, 8 Ara 2021 Çar, 12:13
tarihinde şunu yazdı:
>
> I’ve had good success with this strategy, have the mons chime each other, and perhaps have OSD / other nodes against the mons too.
> Chrony >> ntpd
> With modern interval backoff / iburst there’s no reason to not have a robust set of peers.
>
> The public NTP pools rotate DNS on some period, so when the quality / jitter varies a lot among a given pool you can experience swings.  So depending on the scale of one’s organization, it often makes sense to have a set of internal stratum 2 servers that servers chime against, which mesh among themselves and against both geo-local public servers and a few hand-picked quality *distant* servers.  Jitter matters more than latency AIUI.
>
> Local stratum 1 servers are cool, though getting coax to a DC roof and an antenna mounted can be an expensive hassle.
>
> Success includes a variety of time sources, so that it doesn’t all go to hell when some specific server goes weird or disappears, both of which happen.  Eg, if there’s a window with sky access, even in an office area, add a couple of these (or similar) to the mix, as a source for the workhorse server stratum :
>
> https://www.netburner.com/products/network-time-server/pk70-ex-ntp-network-time-server/#
>
> Not a DC grade item, or a sole solution, but the bang for the buck is unbeatable.
>
>
> Unless things have changed in the last few years, don’t run NTP servers on VMs.  Some network gear can run a server, but be careful with the load it presents and how many clients can be supported without impacting the primary roles.
>
>
> On Dec 8, 2021, at 12:14 AM, Janne Johansson <icepic.dz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Den ons 8 dec. 2021 kl 02:35 skrev mhnx <morphinwithyou@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> I've been building Ceph clusters since 2014 and the most annoying and
>
> worst failure is the NTP server faults and having different times on
>
> Ceph nodes.
>
>
> I've fixed few clusters because of the ntp failure.
>
> - Sometimes NTP servers can be unavailable,
>
> - Sometimes NTP servers can go crazy.
>
> - Sometimes NTP servers can respond but systemd-timesyncd can not sync
>
> the time without manual help.
>
>
> I don't want to deal with another ntp problem and because of that I've
>
> decided to build internal ntp servers for the cluster.
>
>
> I'm thinking of creating 3 NTP servers on the 3 monitor nodes to get
>
> an internal ntp server cluster.
>
> I will use the internal NTP cluster for the OSD nodes and other services.
>
> With this way, I believe that I'll always have a stable and fast time server.
>
>
> We do something like this. mons gather "calendar time" from outside
> ntp servers, but also peer against eachother, so if/when they drift
> away the mons drift away equal amounts, then all OSDs/RGWs and ceph
> clients pull time from the mons who serve internal ntp based on their
> idea of what time it is.
>
> Not using systemd, but both chronyd and ntpd allow you to set peers
> for which you sync "sideways" just to keep the pace in-between hosts.
>
> --
> May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux