Re: bluefs_allocator bitmap or hybrid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Samuel,


On 12/1/2021 11:54 AM, huxiaoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Dear Cephers,

We  are running tons of Ceph clusters on Luminous  with bluefs_allocator being bitmap, and when looking at Nautilus, 14.1.22, bluefs_allocator is now defaulting to hybrid. I am then wondering the follwoing:

1)  what will be the advantage for using hybrid instead of bitmap (which seems to be working very well now)?

Generally it looks like hybrid allocator is faster than bitmap, especially when long continuous chunks to be allocated in a highly fragmented space. But there were also some complains about higher tail latencies caused by hybrid allocator, e.g. https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/52804

Hopefully this is fixed in the master and to be ported back to Octopus soon.


2)  Is it saft to keep Nautilus with bluefs_allocator  settting to bitmap?

yes, it's totally safe.



Cheers,

samuel



huxiaoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx

--
Igor Fedotov
Ceph Lead Developer

Looking for help with your Ceph cluster? Contact us at https://croit.io

croit GmbH, Freseniusstr. 31h, 81247 Munich
CEO: Martin Verges - VAT-ID: DE310638492
Com. register: Amtsgericht Munich HRB 231263
Web: https://croit.io | YouTube: https://goo.gl/PGE1Bx

_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux