A middle ground between containers and 'lts distros'?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I sense the concern about ceph distributions via containers generally has to do with what you might call a feeling of 'opaqueness'.   The feeling is amplified as most folks who choose open source solutions prize being able promptly to address the particular concerns affecting them without having to wait for 'the next (might as well be opaque) release'.

An easy way forward might be if the ceph devs would document an approved set of steps that would add to the current ability to 'ssh in' to a container to  make on the fly changes.  If there was a cephadm command to 'save the current state of a container' in a format that adds a '.lcl.1' '.lcl.2' , then smooth the command line process to allow the cephadm upgrade process to use those saved local images with the local changes as targets, so as to automate pushing out the changes to the rest?

??

Harry Coin



_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux