Re: multiple active MDS servers is OK for production Ceph clusters OR Not

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

in this thread [1] Dan gives very helpful points to consider regarding multi-active MDS. Are you sure you need that? One of our customers has tested such a setup extensively with directory pinning because the MDS balancer couldn't handle the high client load. In order to better utilize the MDS servers (only one thread) they ran multiple daemons per server which also worked quite well. The only issue is the rolling upgrade where you need to reduce the max_mds to 1 which doesn't work here. But this is all still in Nautilus.

[1] https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@xxxxxxx/message/4LNXN6U5DTB2BFPBDGDUKTEB4THD7HCH/


Zitat von huxiaoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxx:

Dear Cephers,

On reading a technical blog from Croit: https://croit.io/blog/ceph-performance-test-and-optimization

It says the following: "It should be noted that it is still debated whether a configuration with multiple active MDS servers is OK for production Ceph clusters."

Just wonder whether multiple active MDS servers is OK for production Ceph clusters OR Not? Does any one has practical lessons ? Can some one share more stories with us, whether success or failure

Thanks a lot in advance,

samuel





huxiaoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux