Hi, Indeed, that's a lot of CPU and RAM, the idea was to put sufficient resources in case we want to expand the nodes with more storage and do EC. I guess having excessive resources shouldn't hurt performance? :-) /Z On Wed, Oct 6, 2021 at 9:26 AM Stefan Kooman <stefan@xxxxxx> wrote: > On 10/5/21 17:06, Zakhar Kirpichenko wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I built a CEPH 16.2.x cluster with relatively fast and modern hardware, > and > > its performance is kind of disappointing. I would very much appreciate an > > advice and/or pointers :-) > > > > The hardware is 3 x Supermicro SSG-6029P nodes, each equipped with: > > > > 2 x Intel(R) Xeon(R) Gold 5220R CPUs > > 384 GB RAM > > 2 x boot drives > > 2 x 1.6 TB Micron 7300 MTFDHBE1T6TDG drives (DB/WAL) > > 2 x 6.4 TB Micron 7300 MTFDHBE6T4TDG drives (storage tier) > > 9 x Toshiba MG06SCA10TE 9TB HDDs, write cache off (storage tier) > > 2 x Intel XL710 NICs connected to a pair of 40/100GE switches > > That's a lot of CPU cores and a lot of RAM for mostly spinners. Why is > that? Will this be a hyperconverged solution? > > Can you repeat the tests with fio with rados and rbd as ioengines on a > bare metal host? > > Gr. Stefan > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |