On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 6:57 PM Eric Dold <dold.eric@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Patrick
>
> Here's the output of ceph fs dump:
>
> e226256
> enable_multiple, ever_enabled_multiple: 0,1
> default compat: compat={},rocompat={},incompat={1=base v0.20,2=client
> writeable ranges,3=default file layouts on dirs,4=dir inode in separate
> object,5=mds uses versioned encoding,6=dirfrag is stored in omap,8=no
> anchor table,9=file layout v2,10=snaprealm v2}
> legacy client fscid: 2
>
> Filesystem 'cephfs' (2)
> fs_name cephfs
> epoch 226254
> flags 12
> created 2019-03-20T14:06:32.588328+0100
> modified 2021-09-17T14:47:08.513192+0200
> tableserver 0
> root 0
> session_timeout 60
> session_autoclose 300
> max_file_size 1099511627776
> required_client_features {}
> last_failure 0
> last_failure_osd_epoch 91941
> compat compat={},rocompat={},incompat={1=base v0.20,2=client writeable
> ranges,3=default file layouts on dirs,4=dir inode in separate object,5=mds
> uses versioned encoding,6=dirfrag is stored in omap,8=no anchor
> table,9=file layout v2,10=snaprealm v2}
> max_mds 1
> in 0,1
> up {}
> failed 0,1
Run:
ceph fs compat add_incompat cephfs 7 "mds uses inline data"
It's interesting you're in the same situation (two ranks). Are you
using cephadm? If not, were you not aware of the MDS upgrade procedure
[1]?
[1] https://docs.ceph.com/en/pacific/cephfs/upgrading/
--
Patrick Donnelly, Ph.D.
He / Him / His
Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat Sunnyvale, CA
GPG: 19F28A586F808C2402351B93C3301A3E258DD79D
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
