Thanks for the suggestions. My viewpoints may be wrong, but i think stability is utmost for us, and an older version such as Luminous may be much well battle-field tested that recent ones. Unless there is some instatbilty or bug reports, I would still trust older versions. Just my own preference on which version takes my turst thanks a lot, Samuel huxiaoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxx From: Eugen Block Date: 2021-09-10 17:21 To: huxiaoyu CC: ceph-users Subject: Re: How many concurrent users can be supported by a single Rados gateway The first suggestion is to not use Luminous since it’s already EOL. We noticed major improvements in performance when upgrading from L to Nautilus, and N will also be EOL soon. Since there are some reports about performance degradation when upgrading to Pacific I would recommend to use Octopus. Zitat von huxiaoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxx: > Dear Cephers， > > I am planning a Ceph Cluster (Lumninous 12.2.13) for hosting on-line > courses for one university. The data would mostly be video media > and thus 4+2 EC coded object store together with CivetWeb RADOS > gateway will be utilized. > > We plan to use 4 physical machines as Rados gateway solely, each > with 2x Intel 6226R CPU and 256 GB memory, for serving 8000 students > concurrently, of which each may incur 2x 2Mb/s video streams. > > Are these 4-machine Rados gateway a reasonable configuration for > 8000 users, or an overkill, or insufficient? > > Suggestions and comments are highly appreciated, > > best regards, > > Samuel > > > > huxiaoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxx > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |