Re: [solved] Unprotect snapshot: device or resource busy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Ilya Dryomov wrote:
: On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 10:50 AM Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: >
: > Ilya Dryomov wrote:
: > : On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 8:37 AM Jan Kasprzak <kas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
: > : >
: > : > # rbd snap unprotect one/one-1312@snap
: > : > 2021-07-01 08:28:40.747 7f3cb6ffd700 -1 librbd::SnapshotUnprotectRequest: cannot unprotect: at least 1 child(ren) [68ba8e7bace188] in pool 'one'
: > : > 2021-07-01 08:28:40.749 7f3cb6ffd700 -1 librbd::SnapshotUnprotectRequest: encountered error: (16) Device or resource busy
: > : > 2021-07-01 08:28:40.749 7f3cb6ffd700 -1 librbd::SnapshotUnprotectRequest: 0x56522f10e830 should_complete_error: ret_val=-16
: > : > rbd: unprotecting snap failed: 2021-07-01 08:28:40.751 7f3cb6ffd700 -1 librbd::SnapshotUnprotectRequest: 0x56522f10e830 should_complete_error: ret_val=-16
: > : >
: > : > As far as I can see neither the snapshot nor the RBD image itself is
: > : > used by a running qemu in my cluster. How can I delete the snapshot
: > : > or debug the problem further?
: > :
: > : There seems to be a clone image that is based on that snapshot.
: > : "rbd children one/one-1312@snap" should give you its name.
: >
: > OK, there was a child which did not show up in "rbd children" - the
: > previously deleted clone. We use the trash feature, so it did not
: > get deleted altogether, but moved to trash instead. I guess "rbd children"
: > should be modified to show also images fro trash.
: >
: > after rbd restore --pool one one-1312-4742-0 I was able to delete
: > the image using "rbd rm one/one-1312-4742-0", unprotect the snapshot
: > with "rbd snap unprotect one/one-1312@snap", and finally delete it
: > with "rbd snap rm one/one-1312@snap".
: >
: > So my immediate problem is fixed, but it would be nice if "rbd children"
: > can also display images from trash.
: 
: "rbd children -a" does that as noted in my previous reply.

	OK, thanks. Our replies were probably sent near the same time.
I think OpenNebula should be modified to use this.

I will fill up an issue in their github repo.

Anyway, thanks for your help.

-Yenya

-- 
| Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> |
| http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/                         GPG: 4096R/A45477D5 |
    We all agree on the necessity of compromise. We just can't agree on
    when it's necessary to compromise.                     --Larry Wall
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux