Hi,
That's right!
We're currently evaluating a similar setup with two identical HW nodes
(on two different sites), with OSD, MON and MDS each, and both nodes
have CephFS mounted.
The goal is to build a minimal self-contained shared filesystem that
remains online during planned updates and can somehow survive should
disaster strike at one of the two sites.
We added a third node (a small VM) running only a monitor to avoid
exactly the described problem.
Best,
Christoph
On 15/06/2021 15.32, Robert Sander wrote:
On 15.06.21 15:16, nORKy wrote:
Why is there no failover ??
Because only one MON out of two is not in the majority to build a quorum.
Regards
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
--
Dr. Christoph Brüning
Universität Würzburg
HPC & DataManagement @ ct.qmat & RZUW
Am Hubland
D-97074 Würzburg
Tel.: +49 931 31-80499
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
