Dave Hall (kdhall) writes: > But the developers aren't out in the field with their deployments > when something weird impacts a cluster and the standard approaches don't > resolve it. And let's face it: Ceph is a marvelously robust solution for > large scale storage, but it is also an amazingly intricate matrix of > layered interdependent processes, and you haven't got all of the bugs > worked out yet. I think you hit a very important point here: the concern with containerized deployments is that they may be a barrier to efficient troubleshooting and bug reporting by traditional methods (strace et al) -- unless a well documented debugging and analysis toolset/methodolgy is provided. Paradoxically, containerized deployments certainly sound like they'd free up lots of cycles from the developer side of things (no more building packages for N distributions as was pointed out, easier upgrade and regression testing), but it might make it more difficult initially for the community to contribute (well, at least for us dinosaurs that aren't born with docker brains). Cheers, Phil _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |