No, it doesn't work with an unedit crush map file. El 6/5/21 a las 18:28, Clyso GmbH - Ceph Foundation Member escribió:
Hi Andres, does the commando work with the original rule/crushmap? ___________________________________ Clyso GmbH - Ceph Foundation Member support@xxxxxxxxx https://www.clyso.com Am 06.05.2021 um 15:21 schrieb Andres Rojas Guerrero:Yes, my ceph version is Nautilus: # ceph -vceph version 14.2.6 (f0aa067ac7a02ee46ea48aa26c6e298b5ea272e9) nautilus (stable)First dump the crush map: # ceph osd getcrushmap -o crush_map Then, decompile the crush map: # crushtool -d crush_map -o crush_map_d Now, edit the crush rule and compile: # crushtool -c crush_map_d -o crush_map_new An finally test the mappings: # crushtool -i crush_map_new --test --rule 2 --num-rep 7 --show-mappings CRUSH rule 2 x 0 [-5,-45,-49,-47,-43,-41,-29] *** Caught signal (Segmentation fault) ** in thread 7f2d717acb40 thread_name:crushtool El 6/5/21 a las 14:13, Eugen Block escribió:Interesting, I haven't had that yet with crushtool. Your ceph version is Nautilus, right? And you did decompile the binary crushmap with crushtool, correct? I don't know how to reproduce that.Zitat von Andres Rojas Guerrero <a.rojas@xxxxxxx>:I have this error when try to show mappings with crushtool:# crushtool -i crush_map_new --test --rule 2 --num-rep 7 --show-mappingsCRUSH rule 2 x 0 [-5,-45,-49,-47,-43,-41,-29] *** Caught signal (Segmentation fault) ** in thread 7f7f7a0ccb40 thread_name:crushtool El 6/5/21 a las 13:47, Eugen Block escribió:Yes it is possible, but you should validate it with crushtool before injecting it to make sure the PGs land where they belong. crushtool -i crushmap.bin --test --rule 2 --num-rep 7 --show-mappingscrushtool -i crushmap.bin --test --rule 2 --num-rep 7 --show-bad-mappingsIf you don't get bad mappings and the 'show-mappings' confirms the PG distribution by host you can inject it. But be aware of a lot of data movement, that could explain the (temporarily) unavailable PGs. But to make your cluster resilient against host failure you'll have to go through that at some point. https://docs.ceph.com/en/latest/rados/operations/crush-map-edits/ Zitat von Andres Rojas Guerrero <a.rojas@xxxxxxx>:Hi, I try to make a new crush rule (Nautilus) in order take the new correct_failure_domain to hosts: "rule_id": 2, "rule_name": "nxtcloudAFhost", "ruleset": 2, "type": 3, "min_size": 3, "max_size": 7, "steps": [ { "op": "set_chooseleaf_tries", "num": 5 }, { "op": "set_choose_tries", "num": 100 }, { "op": "take", "item": -1, "item_name": "default" }, { "op": "choose_indep", "num": 0, "type": "host" }, { "op": "emit" And I have changed the pool to this new crush rule: # ceph osd pool set nxtcloudAF crush_rule nxtcloudAFhost But suddenly the cephfs it's unavailable: # ceph status cluster: id: c74da5b8-3d1b-483e-8b3a-739134db6cf8 health: HEALTH_WARN 11 clients failing to respond to capability release 2 MDSs report slow metadata IOs 1 MDSs report slow requests And clients failing to respond:HEALTH_WARN 11 clients failing to respond to capability release; 2 MDSsreport slow metadata IOs; 1 MDSs report slow requests MDS_CLIENT_LATE_RELEASE 11 clients failing to respond to capability release mdsceph2mon03(mds.1): Client nxtcl3: failing to respond to capability release client_id: 1524269mdsceph2mon01(mds.0): Client nxtcl5:nxtclproAF failing to respond toI reversed the change, returning to the original crush rule, and allit's Ok. My question if it's possible to change on fly the crush rule ofa EC pool. Thanks El 5/5/21 a las 18:14, Andres Rojas Guerrero escribió:Thanks, I will test it. El 5/5/21 a las 16:37, Joachim Kraftmayer escribió:Create a new crush rule with the correct failure domain, test it properly and assign it to the pool(s).-- ******************************************************* Andrés Rojas Guerrero Unidad Sistemas Linux Area Arquitectura Tecnológica Secretaría General Adjunta de Informática Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) Pinar 19 28006 - Madrid Tel: +34 915680059 -- Ext. 990059 email: a.rojas@xxxxxxx ID comunicate.csic.es: @50852720l:matrix.csic.es ******************************************************* _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx-- ******************************************************* Andrés Rojas Guerrero Unidad Sistemas Linux Area Arquitectura Tecnológica Secretaría General Adjunta de Informática Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) Pinar 19 28006 - Madrid Tel: +34 915680059 -- Ext. 990059 email: a.rojas@xxxxxxx ID comunicate.csic.es: @50852720l:matrix.csic.es ******************************************************* _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
-- ******************************************************* Andrés Rojas Guerrero Unidad Sistemas Linux Area Arquitectura Tecnológica Secretaría General Adjunta de Informática Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) Pinar 19 28006 - Madrid Tel: +34 915680059 -- Ext. 990059 email: a.rojas@xxxxxxx ID comunicate.csic.es: @50852720l:matrix.csic.es ******************************************************* _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
