There should not be any performance difference between an un-containerized version and a containerized one. The shift to containers makes sense, as this is the general direction that the industry as a whole is taking. I would suggest giving cephadm a try, it's relatively straight forward and significantly faster for deployments then ceph-ansible is. ________________________________ From: Matthew Vernon <mv3@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 12:50 PM To: ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxx> Subject: ceph-ansible in Pacific and beyond? Hi, I caught up with Sage's talk on what to expect in Pacific ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PVtn53MbxTc ) and there was no mention of ceph-ansible at all. Is it going to continue to be supported? We use it (and uncontainerised packages) for all our clusters, so I'd be a bit alarmed if it was going to go away... Regards, Matthew -- The Wellcome Sanger Institute is operated by Genome Research Limited, a charity registered in England with number 1021457 and a company registered in England with number 2742969, whose registered office is 215 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BE. _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |