Re: XFS block size on RBD / EC vs space amplification

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Actually, with last Igor patches default min alloc size for hdd is 4K



k

Sent from my iPhone

> On 2 Feb 2021, at 13:12, Gilles Mocellin <gilles.mocellin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> As we know, with 64k for bluestore_min_alloc_size_hdd (I'm only using HDDs),
> in certain conditions, especially with erasure coding,
> there's a leak of space while writing objects smaller than 64k x k (EC:k+m).
> 
> Every object is divided in k elements, written on different OSD.
> 
> My main use case is big (40TB) RBD images mounted as XFS filesystems on Linux servers,
> exposed to our backup software.
> So, it's mainly big files.
> 
> My though, but I'd like some other point of view, is that I could deal with the amplification by using bigger block sizes on my XFS filesystems.
> Instead of reducing bluestore_min_alloc_size_hdd on all OSDs.
> 
> What do you think ?
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux