Thank you. This helps a lot. > Josh Baergen <jbaergen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> şunları yazdı (27 Oca 2021 17:08): > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:24 AM George Yil <georgeyil75@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> May I ask if it can be dynamically changed and any disadvantages should be expected? > > Unless there's some magic I'm unaware of, there is no way to > dynamically change this. Each OSD must be recreated with the new > min_alloc_size setting. In production systems this can be quite the > chore, since the safest way to accomplish this is to drain the OSD > (set it 'out', use CRUSH map changes, or use upmaps), recreate it, and > then repopulate it. With automation this can run in the background. > Given how much room you have currently you may be able to do this > host-at-a-time by storing a host's data on the other hosts in a given > rack (though I don't remember what your CRUSH tree looks like so maybe > you can't do this and maintain host independence). > > The downside is potentially more tracking metadata at the OSD level, > though I understand that Nautilus has made improvements here. I'm not > up to speed on the latest state in this area, though. > > Josh _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |