On 30/10/2020 11:28, Wido den Hollander wrote:
On 29/10/2020 18:58, Dan van der Ster wrote:
Hi Wido,
Could it be one of these?
mon osd min up ratio
mon osd min in ratio
36/120 is 0.3 so it might be one of those magic ratios at play.
I thought of those settings and looked at it. The weird thing is that
all 3 racks are equal and it works as expected in the other racks. There
all 40 OSDs are marked as down properly.
These settings should also yield log messages in the MON's log, but they
don't. Searching for 'ratio' in the logfile doesn't show me anything.
It's weird that osd.51 was only marked as down after 15 minutes because
it didn't send a beacon to the MON. Other OSDs kept sending reports that
it was down, but the MONs simply didn't act on it.
See: https://tracker.ceph.com/issues/48274
2020-11-18T02:33:21.498-0500 7f849ae8c700 0 log_channel(cluster) log
[DBG] : osd.58 reported failed by osd.105
2020-11-18T02:33:21.498-0500 7f849ae8c700 10
mon.CEPH2-MON1-206-U39@0(leader).osd e108196 osd.58 has 1 reporters,
82.847365 grace (20.000000 + 62.8474 + 5.67647e-167), max_failed_since
2020-11-18T02:32:59.498216-0500
2020-11-18T02:33:21.498-0500 7f849ae8c700 10
mon.CEPH2-MON1-206-U39@0(leader).log v9218943 logging
2020-11-18T02:33:21.499338-0500 mon.CEPH2-MON1-206-U39 (mon.0) 165 :
cluster [DBG] osd.58 reported failed by osd.105
The MONs kept adding time to the grace period.
In the end setting mon_osd_adjust_heartbeat_grace to 'false' solved it.
Why? I'm not sure yet.
root default
rack 206
host A
rack 207
host B
rack 208
host C
The names of the racks are 'integers' so I tried renaming them to 'r206'
for example, but that didn't work either.
We achieved our goal, but I'm not sure why this setting is preventing
the OSDs from being marked as down.
Wido
Wido
Cheers,
Dan
On Thu, 29 Oct 2020, 18:05 Wido den Hollander, <wido@xxxxxxxx
<mailto:wido@xxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Hi,
I'm investigating an issue where 4 to 5 OSDs in a rack aren't
marked as
down when the network is cut to that rack.
Situation:
- Nautilus cluster
- 3 racks
- 120 OSDs, 40 per rack
We performed a test where we turned off the network Top-of-Rack for
each
rack. This worked as expected with two racks, but with the third
something weird happened.
From the 40 OSDs which were supposed to be marked as down only 36
were
marked as down.
In the end it took 15 minutes for all 40 OSDs to be marked as down.
$ ceph config set mon mon_osd_reporter_subtree_level rack
That setting is set to make sure that we only accept reports from
other
racks.
What we saw in the logs for example:
2020-10-29T03:49:44.409-0400 7fbda185e700 10
mon.CEPH2-MON1-206-U39@0(leader).osd e107102 osd.51 has 54
reporters,
239.856038 grace (20.000000 + 219.856 + 7.43801e-23),
max_failed_since
2020-10-29T03:47:22.374857-0400
But osd.51 was still not marked as down after 54 reporters have
reported
that it is actually down.
I checked, no ping or other traffic possible to osd.51. Host is
unreachable.
Another osd was marked as down, but it took a couple of minutes as
well:
2020-10-29T03:50:54.455-0400 7fbda185e700 10
mon.CEPH2-MON1-206-U39@0(leader).osd e107102 osd.37 has 48
reporters,
221.378970 grace (20.000000 + 201.379 + 6.34437e-23),
max_failed_since
2020-10-29T03:47:12.761584-0400
2020-10-29T03:50:54.455-0400 7fbda185e700 1
mon.CEPH2-MON1-206-U39@0(leader).osd e107102 we have enough
reporters
to mark osd.37 down
In the end osd.51 was marked as down, but only after the MON
decided to
do so:
2020-10-29T03:53:44.631-0400 7fbda185e700 0 log_channel(cluster) log
[INF] : osd.51 marked down after no beacon for 903.943390 seconds
2020-10-29T03:53:44.631-0400 7fbda185e700 -1
mon.CEPH2-MON1-206-U39@0(leader).osd e107104 no beacon from osd.51
since
2020-10-29T03:38:40.689062-0400, 903.943390 seconds ago. marking
down
I haven't seen this happen before in any cluster. It's also strange
that
this only happens in this rack, the other two racks work fine.
ID CLASS WEIGHT TYPE NAME
-1 1545.35999 root default
-206 515.12000 rack 206
-7 27.94499 host CEPH2-206-U16
...
-207 515.12000 rack 207
-17 27.94499 host CEPH2-207-U16
...
-208 515.12000 rack 208
-31 27.94499 host CEPH2-208-U16
...
That's how the CRUSHMap looks like. Straight forward and 3x
replication
over 3 racks.
This issue only occurs in rack *207*.
Has anybody seen this before or knows where to start?
Wido
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
<mailto:ceph-users@xxxxxxx>
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
<mailto:ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
