On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 11:56 PM Alexander E. Patrakov <patrakov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello, > > I found that documentation on the Internet on the question whether I > can safely have two instances of cephfs in my cluster is inconsistent. > For the record, I don't use snapshots. > > FOSDEM 19 presentation by Sage Weil: > https://archive.fosdem.org/2019/schedule/event/ceph_project_status_update/attachments/slides/3251/export/events/attachments/ceph_project_status_update/slides/3251/ceph_new_in_nautilus.pdf > > Slide 25 is specifically devoted to this topic, and declares > multi-volume support as stable. > > But, https://docs.ceph.com/en/nautilus/cephfs/experimental-features/ > declares that multiple filesystems in the same cluster are an > experimental feature, and the "latest" version of the same doc makes > the same claim. > > What should I believe - the presentation or the official docs? We expect to make multi-fs stable in Pacific. -- Patrick Donnelly, Ph.D. He / Him / His Principal Software Engineer Red Hat Sunnyvale, CA GPG: 19F28A586F808C2402351B93C3301A3E258DD79D _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |