Re: Consul as load balancer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Den tis 6 okt. 2020 kl 08:37 skrev Szabo, Istvan (Agoda) <
Istvan.Szabo@xxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Hi,
> Is there anybody tried consul as a load balancer?
> Any experience?

For rgw, load balancing is quite simple, and I guess almost any LB would
work.
The only major thing we have hit is that for AWS4 auth, you need to make
sure that the requests to the backends* actually use the hostname sent by
the client, but apart from that, I can't think of a LB that can handle
http(s) that would not work for S3/RGW.

*) some LBs, when they see a pool of backends as a list of ips like
10.1.2.1, 10.1.2.2, 10.1.2.3 will make the inner request against
http://10.1.2.3:80 instead of http://mybucket.s3.example.com and since the
request hostname is a part of the hash used for auth, the rgw will
calculate it against 10.1.2.3 but the client will of course use
mybucket.s3.example.com.

--
May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux