Frank Schilder <frans@xxxxxx> writes: >> To me it looks like the structure of both maps is pretty much the same - >> or am I mistaken? > > Yes, but you are not Marc Roos. Do you work on the same cluster or do > you observe the same problem? No, but we recently also noticed that rebuilding one pool ("ssd") influenced speed on other pools, which was unexpected. > In any case, here is a thread pointing to the crush tree/rule > conversion I mentioned: > https://lists.ceph.io/hyperkitty/list/ceph-users@xxxxxxx/thread/675QZ2JXXX4RPRNPK2NL7FB5MVANKUB2/#675QZ2JXXX4RPRNPK2NL7FB5MVANKUB2 Thanks will check it out. > The tool is "crushtool reclassify" and is recommended to use when upgrading from luminous to newer to convert crush rules to use device classes. Same here - thanks a lot for the pointers! Cheers, Nico -- Modern, affordable, Swiss Virtual Machines. Visit www.datacenterlight.ch _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx