Hi Samuel, I resent my reply since CC will not be accepted by this mailing list. I'm using Octopus. If it is the release problem, why it is successful with only ms_async_rdma_device_name and ms_async_rdma_gid_idx? Best regards. On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 3:33 PM huxiaoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxx <huxiaoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Which Ceph version are you using? Just wondering Ceph RDMA support is > officially announced, or still on development? > > best regards, > > samuel > > ------------------------------ > huxiaoyu@xxxxxxxxxxxx > > > *From:* Lazuardi Nasution <mrxlazuardin@xxxxxxxxx> > *Date:* 2020-09-18 19:21 > *To:* ceph-users <ceph-users@xxxxxxx> > *Subject:* Ceph RDMA GID Selection Problem > Hi, > > I have something weird about GID selection for Ceph with RDMA. When I do > configuration with ms_async_rdma_device_name and ms_async_rdma_gid_idx, > Ceph with RDMA running successfully. But, when I do configuration with > ms_async_rdma_device_name, ms_async_rdma_local_gid and > ms_async_rdma_roce_ver, Ceph with RDMA is not working, OSDs are down in > seconds after they up. The GID index which is used on the first attempt is > associated with the GID and RoCE version which are used on the second > attempt. Is this the string matter (maybe because GID is using colon > characters) or something else? Using the GID index sometimes gives me > problems due to it not persisting and changes happen every time I do > network reconfiguration (for example: adding/removing VLAN), or even > rebooting. > > Best regards, > > _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |