What about hardlinks, are there any of those? Are there lots of directories or tiny (<4k) files? Also, size=2 is not very safe. You want size=3, min_size=2 if you are doing replication. On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 6:15 PM <fotofors@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hello. > > I'm using the Nautilus Ceph version for some huge folder with approximately 1.7TB of files.I created the filesystem and started to copy files via rsync. > > However, I've had to stop the process, because Ceph shows me that the new size of the folder is almost 6TB. I double checked the replicated size and it is 2. I double checked the rsync options and I didn't copy the files followed by symlinks. > > How would it be possible to explain the extreme difference between the size of the original folder and CephFS? > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |