Re: Editing Crush Map to fix osd_crush_chooseleaf_type = 0

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Yes, I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be. The client performance can be controlled by max-backfills and recovery-max-active settings, there was a thread this week about those.

Zitat von Matt Dunavant <mdunavant@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

Gotcha, 1 more question: During the process, data will be available right? Just performance will be impacted by the rebalancing correct?
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx


--
Eugen Block                             voice   : +49 40 5595175
NDE Netzdesign und -entwicklung AG      fax     : +49 40 5595177
Postfach 61 03 15                       e-mail  : username@xxxxxx
D-22423 Hamburg

         Vertretungsberechtigter Vorstand: Jens-U. Mozdzen
      Vorsitzende des Aufsichtsrats: Angelika Torlée-Mozdzen
           Sitz und Registergericht: Hamburg, HRB 90934
                      USt-IdNr: DE 814 013 983
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux