Hello, Ceph users, Lars Täuber wrote: : +1 from me : : I also hope for a bare metal solution for the upcoming versions. At the moment it is a show stopper for an upgrade to Octopus. Also +1. Not having a unix-style deployment tool is a show-stopper for me as well. So far I keep my servers on Nautilus for this reason. -Yenya : Am Fri, 3 Jul 2020 20:44:02 +0200 : schrieb Oliver Freyermuth <freyermuth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: : : > Of course, no solution ever is perfect, but I really believe a classic "unix-style" solution (i.e. being modular) which can be combined with others : > is essential for any project. : > If there are only full-fledged "all-in-one" solutions such as Ansible or container orchestration, this may be good for many cases, : > but can never cover all user requirements, since it can't be integrated into existing workflows and infrastructures as well as a lightweight module : > I can either use in full or only use parts of. To me, that's part of the Open Source freedom. : > : > Cheers, : > Oliver : : : : -- : Informationstechnologie : Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften : Jägerstraße 22-23 10117 Berlin : Tel.: +49 30 20370-352 http://www.bbaw.de : _______________________________________________ : ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx : To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx -- | Jan "Yenya" Kasprzak <kas at {fi.muni.cz - work | yenya.net - private}> | | http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/ GPG: 4096R/A45477D5 | IORING_OP_NOP ... the benefits of doing nothing asynchronously are minimal, but sometimes a placeholder is useful. --Jonathan Corbet at LWN _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |