Re: Aging in S3 or Moving old data to slow OSDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Khodayar,

Yes, you are correct. I would have to move objects manually between (more
> than one) buckets if I use "Pool placements and Storage classes"
>
> So you have successfully used this method and it was OK?
>

After we set up the new placement rule in the zone and zonegroups we
modified users configuration to set the placement to use. It's worked well
so far :). I'm happy to share how we set up the zones and zonegroups if you
need that information. But I followed what I could find in the ceph docs.

> I may be forced to use this method because clients needs more features
> than mere cache tiering.
>
> Have you ever used S3 Browser "bucket lifecycle rules" and those "storage
> classes"?
>

We use s3 life cycle for data expiration but not for data transition. It
looks like transitions are supported in Nautilus
https://docs.ceph.com/docs/master/radosgw/placement/#storage-classes.

Cheers,
Tom
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux