Rafal,
just to mention - stupid allocator is known to cause high memory usage
in certain scenarios but it uses bluestore_alloc mempool.
Thanks,
Igor
On 5/13/2020 6:52 PM, Rafał Wądołowski wrote:
Mark,
Unfortunetly I closed terminal with mempool. But there was a lot of bytes used by bluestore_cache_other. That was the highest value (about 85%). The onode cache takes about 10%. PGlog and osdmaps was okey, low values. I saw some ideas that maybe compression_mode force in pool can make a mess.
One more thing, we are running stupid allocator. Right now I am decrease the osd_memory_target to 3GiB and will wait if ram problem occurs.
Regards,
Rafał Wądołowski
________________________________
From: Mark Nelson <mnelson@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2020 3:30 PM
To: ceph-users@xxxxxxx <ceph-users@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Memory usage of OSD
On 5/13/20 12:43 AM, RafaĹ' WÄ...doĹ'owski wrote:
Hi,
I noticed strange situation in one of our clusters. The OSD deamons are taking too much RAM.
We are running 12.2.12 and have default configuration of osd_memory_target (4GiB).
Heap dump shows:
osd.2969 dumping heap profile now.
------------------------------------------------
MALLOC: 6381526944 ( 6085.9 MiB) Bytes in use by application
MALLOC: + 0 ( 0.0 MiB) Bytes in page heap freelist
MALLOC: + 173373288 ( 165.3 MiB) Bytes in central cache freelist
MALLOC: + 17163520 ( 16.4 MiB) Bytes in transfer cache freelist
MALLOC: + 95339512 ( 90.9 MiB) Bytes in thread cache freelists
MALLOC: + 28995744 ( 27.7 MiB) Bytes in malloc metadata
MALLOC: ------------
MALLOC: = 6696399008 ( 6386.2 MiB) Actual memory used (physical + swap)
MALLOC: + 218267648 ( 208.2 MiB) Bytes released to OS (aka unmapped)
MALLOC: ------------
MALLOC: = 6914666656 ( 6594.3 MiB) Virtual address space used
MALLOC:
MALLOC: 408276 Spans in use
MALLOC: 75 Thread heaps in use
MALLOC: 8192 Tcmalloc page size
------------------------------------------------
Call ReleaseFreeMemory() to release freelist memory to the OS (via madvise()).
Bytes released to the OS take up virtual address space but no physical memory.
IMO "Bytes in use by application" should be less than osd_memory_target. Am I correct?
I checked heap dump with google-pprof and got following results.
Total: 149.4 MB
60.5 40.5% 40.5% 60.5 40.5% rocksdb::UncompressBlockContentsForCompressionType
34.2 22.9% 63.4% 34.2 22.9% ceph::buffer::create_aligned_in_mempool
11.9 7.9% 71.3% 12.1 8.1% std::_Rb_tree::_M_emplace_hint_unique
10.7 7.1% 78.5% 71.2 47.7% rocksdb::ReadBlockContents
Does it mean that most of RAM is used by rocksdb?
It looks like your heap dump is only accounting for 149.4MB of the
memory so probably not representative across the whole ~6.5G. Instead
could you try dumping the mempools via "ceph daemon osd.2969 dump_mempools"?
How can I take a deeper look into memory usage ?
Beyond looking at the mempools, you can see the bluestore cache
allocation information by either enabling debug bluestore and debug
priority_cache_manager 5, or potentially looking at the PCM perf
counters (I'm not sure if those were in 14.2.12 though). Between the
heap data, mempool data, and priority cache records, it should become
clearer what's going on.
Mark
Regards,
RafaĹ' WÄ...doĹ'owski
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
