Re: Recommendation for decent write latency performance from HDDs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 4:13 PM <jesper@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Offloading the block.db on NVMe / SSD:
> https://docs.ceph.com/docs/mimic/rados/configuration/bluestore-config-ref/
>
> Pro: Easy to deal with - seem heavily supported.
> Con: As far as I can tell - this will only benefit the metadata of the
> osd- not actual data. Thus a data-commit to the osd til still be dominated
> by the writelatency of the underlying - very slow HDD.

small writes (<= 32kb, configurable) are written to db first and
written back to the slow disk asynchronous to the original request.


-- 
Paul Emmerich

Looking for help with your Ceph cluster? Contact us at https://croit.io

croit GmbH
Freseniusstr. 31h
81247 München
www.croit.io
Tel: +49 89 1896585 90

>
> Bcache:
> http://lists.ceph.com/pipermail/ceph-users-ceph.com/2018-June/027713.html
>
> Pro: Closest to the BBWC mentioned above - but with way-way larger cache
> sizes.
> Con: It is hard to see if I end up being the only one on the planet using
> this
> solution.
>
> Eat it - Writes will be as slow as hitting dead-rust - anything that
> cannot live
> with that need to be entirely on SSD/NVMe.
>
> Other?
>
> Thanks for your input.
>
> Jesper
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux