Can you share "ceph pg 6.36a query" output
Steve
On 3/2/20, 2:53 AM, "Simone Lazzaris" <simone.lazzaris@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi there;
I've got a ceph cluster with 4 nodes, each with 9 4TB drives.
Last night a disk failed, and unfortunately this lead to a kernel panic on the hosting server
(supermicro: never again).
One reboot later, the cluster rebalances.
This morning, I'm in this situation:
root@s3:~# ceph status
cluster:
id: 9ec27b0f-acfd-40a3-b35d-db301ac5ce8c
health: HEALTH_ERR
1/13122293 objects unfound (0.000%)
Possible data damage: 1 pg backfill_unfound
Degraded data redundancy: 1 pg undersized
27 slow ops, oldest one blocked for 68 sec, osd.5 has slow ops
services:
mon: 3 daemons, quorum s1,s2,s3 (age 11h)
mgr: s1(active, since 6w), standbys: s2, s3
osd: 36 osds: 35 up (since 11h), 35 in (since 11h); 21 remapped pgs
rgw: 3 daemons active (s1, s2, s3)
data:
pools: 10 pools, 1200 pgs
objects: 13.12M objects, 41 TiB
usage: 63 TiB used, 65 TiB / 127 TiB avail
pgs: 186357/39366879 objects misplaced (0.473%)
1/13122293 objects unfound (0.000%)
1179 active+clean
11 active+remapped+backfilling
9 active+remapped+backfill_wait
1 active+backfill_unfound+undersized+remapped
io:
client: 42 KiB/s rd, 5.2 MiB/s wr, 43 op/s rd, 11 op/s wr
recovery: 163 MiB/s, 48 objects/s
One PG is in "backfill_unfound" status. The PG is the 6.36a, which is on server 1; the failed disk
is the OSD.5, on server 3 (which was rebooted after the panic) so I don't understand the
relation.
This is the unfound object:
root@s3:~# ceph pg 6.36a list_unfound
{
"num_missing": 1,
"num_unfound": 1,
"objects": [
{
"oid": {
"oid": "8a257939-05c9-4ba8-9fd3-fb8504226607.4332.4__shadow_.H5AtB0LjzRSbUWy-
hnVSLf4fs884okG_1",
"key": "",
"snapid": -2,
"hash": 961006442,
"max": 0,
"pool": 6,
"namespace": ""
},
"need": "263'18213",
"have": "0'0",
"flags": "none",
"locations": []
}
],
"more": false
}
How can I handle this error? The docs are not much comforting, as far as I can see the only
thing to do is to mark the missing object as lost and try to cope with that. I'd prefer not.
Any ideas?
*Simone Lazzaris*
*Qcom S.p.A.*
simone.lazzaris@xxxxxxx[1] | www.qcom.it[2]
* LinkedIn[3]* | *Facebook*[4]
--------
[1] mailto:simone.lazzaris@xxxxxxx
[2] https://www.qcom.it
[3] https://www.linkedin.com/company/qcom-spa
[4] http://www.facebook.com/qcomspa
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
