Re: Strange performance drop and low oss performance

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>
>
> For object gateway, the performance is got by `swift-bench -t 64` which
> uses 64 threads concurrently. Will the radosgw and http overhead be so
> significant (94.5MB/s to 26MB/s for cluster1) when multiple threads are
> used? Thanks in advance!
>
>
Can't say what it "must" be, but if I log in to one of my rgw's (we have
several, loadbalanced) and run ceph benchmarks against spindrive pools (ie,
talking ceph directly), I get something like 200MB/s, if I run a write test
on the same host, but talking s3-over-http against itself, I get something
like 100MB/s, so the overhead in my case seems to be 100% (or 50% however
you calculate it).

You know there has to be some kind of penalty for doing protocol
translations, if for nothing else, because of object store client does
checksums, asks rgw to store it, rgw checksums the part(s), asks ceph to
store, ceph sends ack, rgw sends ack to client with checksum and client
compares before moving to next part.
This will be far slower than just plain writes to ceph (the two innermost
ops), and can in part be offset by using large IO, parallel streams,
multiple rgw backends and so on.

-- 
May the most significant bit of your life be positive.
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx



[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux