You can optimize ceph-osd for this of course. It would benefit people that like to use the 1Gbit connections. I can understand putting time into it now does not make sense because of the availability of 10Gbit. However, I do not get why this was not optimized already 5 or 10 years ago. -----Original Message----- Cc: ceph-users; mrxlazuardin Subject: *****SPAM***** Re: Re: small cluster HW upgrade This is a natural condition of bonding, it has little to do with ceph-osd. Make sure your hash policy is set appropriatelly, so that you even have a chance of using both links. https://support.packet.com/kb/articles/lacp-bonding The larger the set of destinations, the more likely you are to spread traffic across both links. > Osd's do not even use bonding effenciently. If it were to use 2 links > concurrently it would be a lot better. > > https://www.mail-archive.com/ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg35474.html > > > > -----Original Message----- > To: ceph-users@xxxxxxx > Subject: Re: small cluster HW upgrade > > Hi Philipp, > > More nodes is better, more availability, more CPU and more RAM. But, > I'm agree that your 1GbE link will be most limiting factor, especially > if there are some SSDs. I suggest you upgrade your networking to 10GbE > (or 25GbE since it will cost you nearly same with 10GbE). Upgrading > your networking is better than using bonding since bonding cannot have > 100% of total links bandwidth. > > Best regards, > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an > email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx > > _______________________________________________ > ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an > email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |