Hi,
The results look strange to me...
To begin with, it's strange that read and write performance differs. But
the thing is that a lot (if not most) large Seagate EXOS drives have
internal SSD cache (~8 GB of it). I suspect that new EXOS also does and
I'm not sure if Toshiba has it. It could explain the write performance
difference in your test.
Try to disable Seagates' write cache with sdparm --set WCE=0 /dev/sdX
and see how the performance changes. If there is an SSD cache you'll
probably see an increase in iops. Due to the nature of Bluestore and at
least with an external block.db on SSD the difference is like ~230 iops
vs ~1200 iops with iodepth=1. This is the result for ST8000NM0055.
Also it's strange that read performance is almost the same. Can you
benchmark the drive with fio alone, without Ceph?
Hi,
we ran some benchmarks with a few samples of Seagate's new HDDs that
some of you might find interesting:
Blog post:
https://croit.io/2020/01/06/2020-01-06-benchmark-mach2
GitHub repo with scripts and raw data:
https://github.com/croit/benchmarks/tree/master/mach2-disks
Tl;dr: way faster for writes, somewhat faster for reads in some
scenarios
Paul
--
Paul Emmerich
Looking for help with your Ceph cluster? Contact us at
https://croit.io
Looking for Ceph training? We have some free spots available
https://croit.io/training/4-days-ceph-in-depth-training
croit GmbH
Freseniusstr. 31h
81247 München
www.croit.io [1]
Tel: +49 89 1896585 90
Links:
------
[1] http://www.croit.io
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
