Can someone please help to respond to the below query ?
Regards
Radha Krishnan S
TCS Enterprise Cloud Practice
Tata Consultancy Services
Cell:- +1 848 466 4870
Mailto: radhakrishnan2.s@xxxxxxx
Website: http://www.tcs.com
____________________________________________
Experience certainty. IT Services
Business Solutions
Consulting
____________________________________________
-----Radhakrishnan2 S/CHN/TCS wrote: -----
To: "Ceph Users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Radhakrishnan2 S/CHN/TCS
Date: 01/09/2020 08:34AM
Subject: OSD Marked down unable to restart continuously failing
Regards
Radha Krishnan S
TCS Enterprise Cloud Practice
Tata Consultancy Services
Cell:- +1 848 466 4870
Mailto: radhakrishnan2.s@xxxxxxx
Website: http://www.tcs.com
____________________________________________
Experience certainty. IT Services
Business Solutions
Consulting
____________________________________________
-----"ceph-users" <ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: -----
From: Radhakrishnan2 S/CHN/TCS
Date: 01/09/2020 08:34AM
Subject: OSD Marked down unable to restart continuously failing
Hello Everyone,
One of the OSD node out of 16 has 12 OSD's with a bcache as NVMe, locally those osd daemons seem to be up and running, while the ceph osd tree shows them as down. Logs show that OSD's have struck IO for over 4096 sec.
I tried checking for iostat, netstat, ceph -w along with the logs. Is there a way to identify why this happening ? In addition, when I restart the OSD daemons on the respective OSD node, restart is failing. Any quick help pls.
Regards
Radha Krishnan S
TCS Enterprise Cloud Practice
Tata Consultancy Services
Cell:- +1 848 466 4870
Mailto: radhakrishnan2.s@xxxxxxx
Website: http://www.tcs.com
____________________________________________
Experience certainty. IT Services
Business Solutions
Consulting
____________________________________________
-----"ceph-users" <ceph-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: -----
To: d.aberger@xxxxxxxxxxxx, "Janne Johansson" <icepic.dz@xxxxxxxxx>
From: "Wido den Hollander"
Sent by: "ceph-users"
Date: 01/09/2020 08:19AM
Cc: "Ceph Users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, a.brandt@xxxxxxxxxxxx, "p.kramme@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <p.kramme@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, j.kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Looking for experience
From: "Wido den Hollander"
Sent by: "ceph-users"
Date: 01/09/2020 08:19AM
Cc: "Ceph Users" <ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, a.brandt@xxxxxxxxxxxx, "p.kramme@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <p.kramme@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, j.kruse@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Looking for experience
"External email. Open with Caution"
On 1/9/20 2:07 PM, Daniel Aberger - Profihost AG wrote:
>
> Am 09.01.20 um 13:39 schrieb Janne Johansson:
>>
>> I'm currently trying to workout a concept for a ceph cluster which can
>> be used as a target for backups which satisfies the following
>> requirements:
>>
>> - approx. write speed of 40.000 IOP/s and 2500 Mbyte/s
>>
>>
>> You might need to have a large (at least non-1) number of writers to get
>> to that sum of operations, as opposed to trying to reach it with one
>> single stream written from one single client.
>
>
> We are aiming for about 100 writers.
So if I read it correctly the writes will be 64k each.
That should be doable, but you probably want something like NVMe for DB+WAL.
You might want to tune that larger writes also go into the WAL to speed
up the ingress writes. But you mainly want more spindles then less.
Wido
>
> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
On 1/9/20 2:07 PM, Daniel Aberger - Profihost AG wrote:
>
> Am 09.01.20 um 13:39 schrieb Janne Johansson:
>>
>> I'm currently trying to workout a concept for a ceph cluster which can
>> be used as a target for backups which satisfies the following
>> requirements:
>>
>> - approx. write speed of 40.000 IOP/s and 2500 Mbyte/s
>>
>>
>> You might need to have a large (at least non-1) number of writers to get
>> to that sum of operations, as opposed to trying to reach it with one
>> single stream written from one single client.
>
>
> We are aiming for about 100 writers.
So if I read it correctly the writes will be 64k each.
That should be doable, but you probably want something like NVMe for DB+WAL.
You might want to tune that larger writes also go into the WAL to speed
up the ingress writes. But you mainly want more spindles then less.
Wido
>
> Cheers
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
=====-----=====-----=====
Notice: The information contained in this e-mail
message and/or attachments to it may contain
confidential or privileged information. If you are
not the intended recipient, any dissemination, use,
review, distribution, printing or copying of the
information contained in this e-mail message
and/or attachments to it are strictly prohibited. If
you have received this communication in error,
please notify us by reply e-mail or telephone and
immediately and permanently delete the message
and any attachments. Thank you
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
