On Sun, 8 Dec 2019 at 00:53, Martin Verges <martin.verges@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > Swap is nothing you want to have in a Server as it is very slow and can cause long downtimes. Given the commentary on this page advocating at least some swap to enable Linux to manage memory when under pressure: https://utcc.utoronto.ca/~cks/space/blog/unix/NoSwapConsequence is it worth modifying the advice to at least have some swap available (even if only say 5% of overall memory)? There was a hnews thread here but to me it seemed inconclusive about solving the overall problem (other than applications taking more responsibility for memory consumption): https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20641551 _______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
 |