Re: Impact of a small DB size with Bluestore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The documentation tell to size the DB to 4% of the disk data ie 240GB
for a 6 TB disk. Plz gives more explanations when your answer disagree
with the documentation !

Le lun. 25 nov. 2019 à 11:00, Konstantin Shalygin <k0ste@xxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>
> I have an Ceph cluster which was designed for file store. Each host
> have 5 SSDs write intensive of 400GB and 20 HDD of 6TB. So each HDD
> have a WAL of 5 GB on SSD
> If i want to put Bluestore on this cluster, i can only allocate ~75GB
> of WAL and DB on SSD for each HDD which is far below the 4% limit of
> 240GB (for 6TB)
> In the doc, i read "It is recommended that the block.db size isn’t
> smaller than 4% of block. For example, if the block size is 1TB, then
> block.db shouldn’t be less than 40GB."
> Are the 4% mandatory ? What should i expect ? Only relative slow
> performance or problem with such a configuration ?
>
> You should use not more 1Gb for WAL and 30Gb for RocksDB. Numbers ! 3,30,300 (Gb) for block.db is useless.
>
>
>
> k
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com




[Index of Archives]     [Information on CEPH]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Ceph Development]     [Ceph Large]     [Ceph Dev]     [Linux USB Development]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [xfs]


  Powered by Linux