This turned out to be because another OSD (no 90) went missing, and the PG wanted to query the missing OSD for unfound object even if this OSD was not part of the PG.
I found this out by doing `ceph pg query 41.3db`
Marking OSD 90 as lost resolved this issue and all PG's became active. A tiny bit of the most recently uploaded data was lost but that was a non-issue in this case.
On Sun, Nov 3, 2019 at 7:34 PM Martin Verges <martin.verges@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
We had this with older Ceph versions, maybe just try to restart all OSDs of affected PGs.--
Martin Verges
Managing director
Mobile: +49 174 9335695
E-Mail: martin.verges@xxxxxxxx
Chat: https://t.me/MartinVerges
croit GmbH, Freseniusstr. 31h, 81247 Munich
CEO: Martin Verges - VAT-ID: DE310638492
Com. register: Amtsgericht Munich HRB 231263
Web: https://croit.io
YouTube: https://goo.gl/PGE1BxAm So., 3. Nov. 2019 um 20:13 Uhr schrieb Kári Bertilsson <karibertils@xxxxxxxxx>:_______________________________________________pgs: 14.377% pgs not active
3749681/537818808 objects misplaced (0.697%)
810 active+clean
156 down
124 active+remapped+backfilling
1 active+remapped+backfill_toofull
1 down+inconsistentwhen looking at the down pg's all disks are online41.3db 53775 0 0 0 401643186092 0 0 3044 down 6m 161222'303144 162913:4630171 [32,96,128,115,86,129,113,124,57,109]p32 [32,96,128,115,86,129,113,124,57,109]p32 2019-11-03Any way to see why the pg is down ?
ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list -- ceph-users@xxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to ceph-users-leave@xxxxxxx
