OK, thanks.
On Fri, Oct 25, 2019 at 6:07 PM Wido den Hollander <wido@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10/25/19 5:27 AM, luckydog xf wrote:
> Hi, list,
>
> Currently my ceph nodes with 3 MON and 9 OSDs, everything is fine.
> Now I plan to add onre more public network, the initial public network
> is 103.x/24, and the target network is 109.x/24. And 103 cannot reach
> 109, as I don't config route table for them.
>
> I add 109.x for 3 MON nodes and they could reach one another, and I add
> ----
That will not work. Make sure there is routing between the IP-space.
That's the easiest and probably only way to make this work.
Wido
> public_network = 172.16.103.0/24 <http://172.16.103.0/24>,
> 172.16.109.0/24 <http://172.16.109.0/24>
> ----
> After I manually change monmap file and run `ceph -s`
> -----
> services:
> mon: 6 daemons, quorum
> cephnode001,cephnode002,cephnode003,cephnode001-109,cephnode002-109,cephnode003-109
> ----
> I check 6789 for both 103.x and 109.x is listening properly. But I mount
> cephfs through IP 109.x, it fails.
>
> I use tcpdump and find there does have traffic directed to 109.x
> interfaces of 3 MON host.
>
> Anything wrong? Is it doable to have 2 public networks(subnets), served
> for connections sourced from different subnets? I.E, 109 network for
> connection from 109.x, while 103 network for 103.x?
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ceph-users mailing list
> ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
>
_______________________________________________
ceph-users mailing list
ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
_______________________________________________ ceph-users mailing list ceph-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.ceph.com/listinfo.cgi/ceph-users-ceph.com
